Page 001 |
Previous | 1 of 3 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
MARKETING PIH-24 pork industry handbook COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE • PURDUE UNIVERSITY • WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA Optimal Weight to Market Slaughter Hogs Authors Glenn Grimes, University of Missouri G. R. Carlisle, University of Illinois Reviewers William T. Ahlschwede, University of Nebraska Philip L. Spike, Iowa State University Linden Olson, Worthington, Minnesota For many years the recommended weight to sell barrows and gilts as slaughter hogs was, in most instances, 200-220 lb. Two reasons for this recommendation were: (1) available research indicated that feed costs increased substantially above this weight, and (2) most of the added pounds above 220 were fat. A possible third reason was that the wholesale cuts—hams, loins, butts, and bellies— from heavier hogs weighed more, and these heavier cuts were discounted. This was, of course, related to the second reason: heavier cuts in the past were fatter because they came from the bigger and fatter hogs and were, therefore, of less value. The best weight to market hogs now is influenced by a number of factors. They include: (1) type of hogs produced: (2) price of hogs relative to feed prices; (3) market discounts for heavier weights; (4) season of the year. Feed Conversion Research results in feed conversion and other production characteristics for meaty hogs at a number of stations are shown in Table 1. Pigs were fed from starting weights of 40-60 lb. to the final market weights shown. Table 1. Summary, research with meaty hogs, selected university experiment stations, 1966-1974. Missouri, 1966—25 pigs per lot Pounds Market weight 223 262 Daily gain 1.68 1.52 Feed/lb. gain 4.00 4.12 Feed/lb. gain from 223 to 262 lb. 4.64 Missouri, 1967—25 pigs per lot Market weight 229 269 Daily gain 1.54 1.63 Feed/lb. gain 3.80 3.76 Feed/lb. gain from 229 to 269 lb. 3.58 Florida, 1969—18 pigs per lot Market weight 200 250 Daily gain 2.03 2.02 Feed/lb. gain 3.14 3.43 Feed/lb. gain from 200 to 250 lb. 4.06 South Dakota, 1972 Pounds Market weight 210 250 Daily gain 1.80 1.81 Feed/lb. gain 3.25 3.50 Feed/lb. gain from 210 to 250 lb. 4 50 Iowa, 1974 Market weight 200 250 Daily gain 1.81 1.93 Feed/lb. gain 3.27 3.38 Feed/lb. gain from 200 to 250 lb. 3.71 Texas, 1974 Market weight 200 250 Daily gain 2.04 2.02 Feed/lb. gain 3.14 3.43 Feed/lb. gain from 200 to 250 lb. 4.30 Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Horne Economics, State of Indiana, Purdue University and U. S. Department of Agriculture Cooperating. H. G. Diesslin, Director, West Lafayette, Ind. Issued in furtherance of the Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914. It is the policy of the Cooperative Extension Service of Purdue University that all persons shall have equal opportunity and access to its programs and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex or national origin.
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-mimeoPIH024 |
Title | Extension Pork Industry Handbook, no. 024 (no date) |
Title of Issue | Optimal weight to market slaughter hogs |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Pork Industry Handbook (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 10/27/2016 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-mimeoPIH024.tif |
Description
Title | Page 001 |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Pork Industry Handbook (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Transcript | MARKETING PIH-24 pork industry handbook COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SERVICE • PURDUE UNIVERSITY • WEST LAFAYETTE, INDIANA Optimal Weight to Market Slaughter Hogs Authors Glenn Grimes, University of Missouri G. R. Carlisle, University of Illinois Reviewers William T. Ahlschwede, University of Nebraska Philip L. Spike, Iowa State University Linden Olson, Worthington, Minnesota For many years the recommended weight to sell barrows and gilts as slaughter hogs was, in most instances, 200-220 lb. Two reasons for this recommendation were: (1) available research indicated that feed costs increased substantially above this weight, and (2) most of the added pounds above 220 were fat. A possible third reason was that the wholesale cuts—hams, loins, butts, and bellies— from heavier hogs weighed more, and these heavier cuts were discounted. This was, of course, related to the second reason: heavier cuts in the past were fatter because they came from the bigger and fatter hogs and were, therefore, of less value. The best weight to market hogs now is influenced by a number of factors. They include: (1) type of hogs produced: (2) price of hogs relative to feed prices; (3) market discounts for heavier weights; (4) season of the year. Feed Conversion Research results in feed conversion and other production characteristics for meaty hogs at a number of stations are shown in Table 1. Pigs were fed from starting weights of 40-60 lb. to the final market weights shown. Table 1. Summary, research with meaty hogs, selected university experiment stations, 1966-1974. Missouri, 1966—25 pigs per lot Pounds Market weight 223 262 Daily gain 1.68 1.52 Feed/lb. gain 4.00 4.12 Feed/lb. gain from 223 to 262 lb. 4.64 Missouri, 1967—25 pigs per lot Market weight 229 269 Daily gain 1.54 1.63 Feed/lb. gain 3.80 3.76 Feed/lb. gain from 229 to 269 lb. 3.58 Florida, 1969—18 pigs per lot Market weight 200 250 Daily gain 2.03 2.02 Feed/lb. gain 3.14 3.43 Feed/lb. gain from 200 to 250 lb. 4.06 South Dakota, 1972 Pounds Market weight 210 250 Daily gain 1.80 1.81 Feed/lb. gain 3.25 3.50 Feed/lb. gain from 210 to 250 lb. 4 50 Iowa, 1974 Market weight 200 250 Daily gain 1.81 1.93 Feed/lb. gain 3.27 3.38 Feed/lb. gain from 200 to 250 lb. 3.71 Texas, 1974 Market weight 200 250 Daily gain 2.04 2.02 Feed/lb. gain 3.14 3.43 Feed/lb. gain from 200 to 250 lb. 4.30 Cooperative Extension Work in Agriculture and Horne Economics, State of Indiana, Purdue University and U. S. Department of Agriculture Cooperating. H. G. Diesslin, Director, West Lafayette, Ind. Issued in furtherance of the Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914. It is the policy of the Cooperative Extension Service of Purdue University that all persons shall have equal opportunity and access to its programs and facilities without regard to race, religion, color, sex or national origin. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 001