Page 001 |
Previous | 1 of 6 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Research Progress Report 303 April, 1967 Liquid vs. Dry Supplements for Fattening Steers T. W. Perry, W. M. Beeson, D. M. Robinson and M. T. Mohler Department of Animal Sciences Summary Liquid and dry high urea supplements were compared with Purdue Supplement A (32 percent crude protein, all of which is from natural sources) as supplements to cattle fattening rations built around limited corn silage and a full feed of high moisture corn. Steers fed Supplement A gained approximately 7 percent faster than cattle fed Purdue 64 (dry) or Purdue Liquid 64. There was no significant difference in gain between the cattle on the two high urea supplements. The advantage in favor of Supplement A was obtained largely during the first 28 days of the 169 day feeding trial when the cattle on the high urea supplements were going through an apparent adjustment period. After the initial adjustment, rates of gain among the three supplements being compared were similar. Most economical gains were obtained by cattle fed Purdue Liquid 64. Feed cost per pound of gain was 13.4 cents for cattle fed Purdue Liquid 64; 14.0 cents for those fed Purdue 64 (dry); and 14.4 cents for those fed Supplement A. The feeding of 70 milligrams of aureomycin per head, daily, resulted in a 5 percent increase in gain but did not improve the efficiency of feed conversion. Aureomycin and high urea supplements are quite compatible. In fact, one of the greatest increases in gain from aureomycin feeding was with Purdue Liquid 64 wherein a 0.2 pound increase in daily gain was obtained. Introduction The introduction of Purdue Supplement A in the late 40's launched a new era in beef cattle feeding in which cattle supplementation became more sophisticated than merely supplying extra protein plus some three or four major minerals. Cattle nutrition research has shown the need for attention 1/ Supported in part by a grant-in-aid from Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, Oklahoma. Urea and phosphoric acid were supplied by Phillips Petroleum Company; chelated trace minerals were supplied by Erly Fat Livestock Feed Company, Tucson, Arizona; soluble vitamin A was supplied by Hoffman La Roche and Company, Nutley, New Jersey; soluble diethylstilbestrol was supplied by Elanco Products Company, Greenfield, Indiana, aureomycin andurea were supplied by American Cyanamid Company, Agricultural Division, Princeton, N. J PURDUE UNIVERSITY • Agricultural Experiment Station • Lafayette, Indiana
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | UA14-13-RPR303 |
Title | Research Progress Report, no. 303 (Apr. 1967) |
Title of Issue | Liquid versus dry supplements for fattening steers |
Date of Original | 1967 |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Research Progress Report (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 06/06/2017 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
URI | UA14-13-RPR303.tif |
Description
Title | Page 001 |
Genre | Periodical |
Collection Title | Extension Research Progress Report (Purdue University. Agricultural Extension Service) |
Rights Statement | Copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Coverage | United States – Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Transcript | Research Progress Report 303 April, 1967 Liquid vs. Dry Supplements for Fattening Steers T. W. Perry, W. M. Beeson, D. M. Robinson and M. T. Mohler Department of Animal Sciences Summary Liquid and dry high urea supplements were compared with Purdue Supplement A (32 percent crude protein, all of which is from natural sources) as supplements to cattle fattening rations built around limited corn silage and a full feed of high moisture corn. Steers fed Supplement A gained approximately 7 percent faster than cattle fed Purdue 64 (dry) or Purdue Liquid 64. There was no significant difference in gain between the cattle on the two high urea supplements. The advantage in favor of Supplement A was obtained largely during the first 28 days of the 169 day feeding trial when the cattle on the high urea supplements were going through an apparent adjustment period. After the initial adjustment, rates of gain among the three supplements being compared were similar. Most economical gains were obtained by cattle fed Purdue Liquid 64. Feed cost per pound of gain was 13.4 cents for cattle fed Purdue Liquid 64; 14.0 cents for those fed Purdue 64 (dry); and 14.4 cents for those fed Supplement A. The feeding of 70 milligrams of aureomycin per head, daily, resulted in a 5 percent increase in gain but did not improve the efficiency of feed conversion. Aureomycin and high urea supplements are quite compatible. In fact, one of the greatest increases in gain from aureomycin feeding was with Purdue Liquid 64 wherein a 0.2 pound increase in daily gain was obtained. Introduction The introduction of Purdue Supplement A in the late 40's launched a new era in beef cattle feeding in which cattle supplementation became more sophisticated than merely supplying extra protein plus some three or four major minerals. Cattle nutrition research has shown the need for attention 1/ Supported in part by a grant-in-aid from Phillips Petroleum Company, Bartlesville, Oklahoma. Urea and phosphoric acid were supplied by Phillips Petroleum Company; chelated trace minerals were supplied by Erly Fat Livestock Feed Company, Tucson, Arizona; soluble vitamin A was supplied by Hoffman La Roche and Company, Nutley, New Jersey; soluble diethylstilbestrol was supplied by Elanco Products Company, Greenfield, Indiana, aureomycin andurea were supplied by American Cyanamid Company, Agricultural Division, Princeton, N. J PURDUE UNIVERSITY • Agricultural Experiment Station • Lafayette, Indiana |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 400 ppi on a BookEye 3 scanner using Opus software. Display images generated in Contentdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 001