page 541 |
Previous | 1 of 13 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Use of Sand Filter-Activated Carbon System for Refinery Wastewater Treatment P. KRISHNAN, Senior Project Engineer R. F. PEOPLES, Project Manager Roy F. Weston, Inc. West Chester, Pennsylvania R. N. SIMONSEN, Consultant Air and Water Conservation Standard Oil Company (SOHIO) Cleveland, Ohio INTRODUCTION B. P. Oil Corporation, a subsidiary of the Standard Oil Co. (Ohio), operates a 105,000 barrels/day refinery in Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania. The refinery is located directly on the lower Delaware River and, thus, the effluent discharges are subject to the jurisdiction of the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC). Wastewater dischargers into the Delaware River have been given individual pounds/day allocation of FSUOD (First Stage Ultimate Oxygen Demand). For B. P. Oil's Marcus Hook Refinery, this allocation was established as 2,650 lbs/day. To help meet this limit, B. P. Oil has undertaken a program to provide more complete segregation of clean water from the Process Sewer and the API Separator and to eliminate minor contamination of the clean water sewer system. At the same time, an investigation was initiated to determine the most suitable method of treating the process wastewaters. A combination of pilot work and desk top analysis was used to define the required facilities for both a conventional activated sludge system and an aerated lagoon system. The presence of significant amounts of oil, mostly in emulsified form in the API Separator effluent indicated the need for pretreatment of API Separator effluent prior to biological treatment. With proper pretreatment, either the activated sludge or the aerated lagoon system could accomplish the primary objective of meeting DRBC's discharge allocation; however, other considerations prompted further treatability investigation. Of great concern to B. P. was the considerable land area required for either type of biological system but especially for the aerated lagoon. The commitment of prime riverfront real estate to wastewater treatment by biological methods, thus eliminating it from future use for refinery purposes, was not attractive. In addition, expensive relocation of utilities and rerouting of some in-plant sewers would be required. Furthermore, biological units are often sensitive to variations in influent loads (i.e., temperature, pH, oil, and other contaminants), and the effluent normally reflects these fluctuations. The biological treatment process also produces a 541
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197147 |
Title | Use of sand filter-activated carbon system for refinery wastewater treatment |
Author |
Krishnan, P. Peoples, R. F. Simonsen, R. N. |
Date of Original | 1971 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 26th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,19214 |
Extent of Original | p. 541-553 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 140 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-25 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 541 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Use of Sand Filter-Activated Carbon System for Refinery Wastewater Treatment P. KRISHNAN, Senior Project Engineer R. F. PEOPLES, Project Manager Roy F. Weston, Inc. West Chester, Pennsylvania R. N. SIMONSEN, Consultant Air and Water Conservation Standard Oil Company (SOHIO) Cleveland, Ohio INTRODUCTION B. P. Oil Corporation, a subsidiary of the Standard Oil Co. (Ohio), operates a 105,000 barrels/day refinery in Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania. The refinery is located directly on the lower Delaware River and, thus, the effluent discharges are subject to the jurisdiction of the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC). Wastewater dischargers into the Delaware River have been given individual pounds/day allocation of FSUOD (First Stage Ultimate Oxygen Demand). For B. P. Oil's Marcus Hook Refinery, this allocation was established as 2,650 lbs/day. To help meet this limit, B. P. Oil has undertaken a program to provide more complete segregation of clean water from the Process Sewer and the API Separator and to eliminate minor contamination of the clean water sewer system. At the same time, an investigation was initiated to determine the most suitable method of treating the process wastewaters. A combination of pilot work and desk top analysis was used to define the required facilities for both a conventional activated sludge system and an aerated lagoon system. The presence of significant amounts of oil, mostly in emulsified form in the API Separator effluent indicated the need for pretreatment of API Separator effluent prior to biological treatment. With proper pretreatment, either the activated sludge or the aerated lagoon system could accomplish the primary objective of meeting DRBC's discharge allocation; however, other considerations prompted further treatability investigation. Of great concern to B. P. was the considerable land area required for either type of biological system but especially for the aerated lagoon. The commitment of prime riverfront real estate to wastewater treatment by biological methods, thus eliminating it from future use for refinery purposes, was not attractive. In addition, expensive relocation of utilities and rerouting of some in-plant sewers would be required. Furthermore, biological units are often sensitive to variations in influent loads (i.e., temperature, pH, oil, and other contaminants), and the effluent normally reflects these fluctuations. The biological treatment process also produces a 541 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 541