page 530 |
Previous | 1 of 11 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Bacterial Regulation in Aquatic Ecosystems PAT C. KERR, Biologist D. L. BROCKWAY, Biologist DORIS F. PARIS, Chemist JOHN T. BARNETT, Jr., Biological Aide Environmental Protection Agency Southeast Water Laboratory National Pollutants Fate Research Program Athens, Georgia INTRODUCTION The role of the decomposer organisms—bacteria, fungi, and protozoa—has received little attention in eutrophication studies during the last 30 years. Prior to that time, a great deal of emphasis had been placed on the role of these organisms in stream self-purification (1), in nutrient regeneration in lakes (2, 3, 4), and in oceans (5, 6). Within the last two years, increased interest in nutrient cycling in aquatic ecosystems—particularly studies on the role of carbon in eutrophication (7, 8, 9, 10, 11)—has created renewed interest in studies of aquatic bacteria. Bacteria, like other small organisms, have high metabolic rates and short generation times. Thus, instantaneous estimation of the bacterial population cannot assess the impact of these organisms on ecosystems. The growth and death of organisms and the concomitant nutrient cycling is a dynamic process which can only be understood from kinetic studies. Genetic, nutritional, physical, and chemical factors can all regulate the extent and rate of biological activities. An attempt will be made in this paper to demonstrate some specific effects of selected parameters on the growth of aquatic bacteria, the importance of bacteria in eutrophication, and some of the difficulties inherent in the interpretation of data from field studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS All chemical and biological analyses were performed on aliquants from the same water sample. No chemical analyses were done on the sediment samples. Total inorganic carbon (TIC), total organic carbon (TOC), inorganic phosphorus (P), total phosphorus (TP), nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), ammonium-nitrogen (NH4-N), oxygen (O2), pH, and numbers of bacteria were determined from water samples as described in Brockway, Kerr, Paris, Barnett, this volume. Bacterial data will be reported from: 530
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC197146 |
Title | Bacterial regulation in aquatic ecosystems |
Author |
Kerr, Pat C. Brockway, Donald L. Paris, Doris F. Barnett, John T. |
Date of Original | 1971 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 26th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,19214 |
Extent of Original | p. 530-540 |
Series | Engineering extension series no. 140 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-06-25 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 530 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Bacterial Regulation in Aquatic Ecosystems PAT C. KERR, Biologist D. L. BROCKWAY, Biologist DORIS F. PARIS, Chemist JOHN T. BARNETT, Jr., Biological Aide Environmental Protection Agency Southeast Water Laboratory National Pollutants Fate Research Program Athens, Georgia INTRODUCTION The role of the decomposer organisms—bacteria, fungi, and protozoa—has received little attention in eutrophication studies during the last 30 years. Prior to that time, a great deal of emphasis had been placed on the role of these organisms in stream self-purification (1), in nutrient regeneration in lakes (2, 3, 4), and in oceans (5, 6). Within the last two years, increased interest in nutrient cycling in aquatic ecosystems—particularly studies on the role of carbon in eutrophication (7, 8, 9, 10, 11)—has created renewed interest in studies of aquatic bacteria. Bacteria, like other small organisms, have high metabolic rates and short generation times. Thus, instantaneous estimation of the bacterial population cannot assess the impact of these organisms on ecosystems. The growth and death of organisms and the concomitant nutrient cycling is a dynamic process which can only be understood from kinetic studies. Genetic, nutritional, physical, and chemical factors can all regulate the extent and rate of biological activities. An attempt will be made in this paper to demonstrate some specific effects of selected parameters on the growth of aquatic bacteria, the importance of bacteria in eutrophication, and some of the difficulties inherent in the interpretation of data from field studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS All chemical and biological analyses were performed on aliquants from the same water sample. No chemical analyses were done on the sediment samples. Total inorganic carbon (TIC), total organic carbon (TOC), inorganic phosphorus (P), total phosphorus (TP), nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N), ammonium-nitrogen (NH4-N), oxygen (O2), pH, and numbers of bacteria were determined from water samples as described in Brockway, Kerr, Paris, Barnett, this volume. Bacterial data will be reported from: 530 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 530