page 402 |
Previous | 1 of 13 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
A COMPARISON OF OZONE AND HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN THE EMERGENCY OXIDATION OF A REFINERY WASTEWATER Nathan C. Burbank, Jr., Professor School of Public Health University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Robert Matsumoto, Project Engineer S and S Corporation Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Glenn Inouye, Chemist City and County of Honolulu Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 INTRODUCTION The importance of the petroleum refining industry cannot be estimated, as a source of primary energy, power for transport and innumerable product derivatives ranging from fertilizer to plastics. The waste from such refineries varies with the crude supplied, the complexity of the refinery processes, and the number and diversity of the products. Methods of waste treatment vary from refinery to refinery; however, in modern practice there is a primary oU separator for oU and grease removal, sedimentation basins for the removal of sludge and grit, followed by a biological treatment unit which reduces the BOD5, phenol and suspended solids to levels acceptable to the receiving water. Major responsibUity is placed on the satisfactory operation of the biological treatment process for the production of a stable acceptable effluent. On rare occasions there have been unforeseen accidents including discharges of hazardous wastes which have upset the biological treatment process to the point that it was ineffective and could not produce an acceptable effluent. It was in view of these rare events that a faUsafe method of treatment was sought, one which would operate despite hazardous and toxic discharges yet produce an effluent acceptable to the receiving body of water. THE REFINERY The refinery under consideration in this study is a 59,000-barrel per day capacity unit producing 26 different products ranging from asphalt, Bunker C fuel oil, heavy and light fuel oils, diesel fuel, jet fuel, avgas, motor gasoline, LPG, carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid from crude oils secured from Alaska, Indonesia and Iran. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the refining process at this refinery. The crudes are fractionated in an atmospheric still at 800 F. The various fractions of the crude are cut out for marketing or further processed in a catalytic cracker and a plate reformer to create a more desirable product which is processed for market. Certain fractions from the catalytic cracker are fed to a hydrogen former and a hydrogenation unit for combination into heavier molecules or to the isomerization-alkylation unit where the molecules are rearranged to form alkylate, a high-octane component of motor and aviation gasolines. Sulfur in the crude is transformed first to hydrogen sulfide and then to sulfuric acid in a catalytic oxidation process under less than atmospheric pressure. While water use at this plant has been minimized—recirculation and atmospheric cooling towers are used-there is a primary wastestream at the plant termed tfye oUy water 402
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC1977041 |
Title | Comparison of ozone and hydrogen peroxide in the emergency oxidation of a refinery wastewater |
Author |
Burbank, N. C. (Nathan C.) Matsumoto, Robert Inouye, Glenn |
Date of Original | 1977 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 32nd Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,26931 |
Extent of Original | p. 402-414 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-01 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 402 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | A COMPARISON OF OZONE AND HYDROGEN PEROXIDE IN THE EMERGENCY OXIDATION OF A REFINERY WASTEWATER Nathan C. Burbank, Jr., Professor School of Public Health University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Robert Matsumoto, Project Engineer S and S Corporation Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Glenn Inouye, Chemist City and County of Honolulu Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 INTRODUCTION The importance of the petroleum refining industry cannot be estimated, as a source of primary energy, power for transport and innumerable product derivatives ranging from fertilizer to plastics. The waste from such refineries varies with the crude supplied, the complexity of the refinery processes, and the number and diversity of the products. Methods of waste treatment vary from refinery to refinery; however, in modern practice there is a primary oU separator for oU and grease removal, sedimentation basins for the removal of sludge and grit, followed by a biological treatment unit which reduces the BOD5, phenol and suspended solids to levels acceptable to the receiving water. Major responsibUity is placed on the satisfactory operation of the biological treatment process for the production of a stable acceptable effluent. On rare occasions there have been unforeseen accidents including discharges of hazardous wastes which have upset the biological treatment process to the point that it was ineffective and could not produce an acceptable effluent. It was in view of these rare events that a faUsafe method of treatment was sought, one which would operate despite hazardous and toxic discharges yet produce an effluent acceptable to the receiving body of water. THE REFINERY The refinery under consideration in this study is a 59,000-barrel per day capacity unit producing 26 different products ranging from asphalt, Bunker C fuel oil, heavy and light fuel oils, diesel fuel, jet fuel, avgas, motor gasoline, LPG, carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid from crude oils secured from Alaska, Indonesia and Iran. Figure 1 shows a flow diagram of the refining process at this refinery. The crudes are fractionated in an atmospheric still at 800 F. The various fractions of the crude are cut out for marketing or further processed in a catalytic cracker and a plate reformer to create a more desirable product which is processed for market. Certain fractions from the catalytic cracker are fed to a hydrogen former and a hydrogenation unit for combination into heavier molecules or to the isomerization-alkylation unit where the molecules are rearranged to form alkylate, a high-octane component of motor and aviation gasolines. Sulfur in the crude is transformed first to hydrogen sulfide and then to sulfuric acid in a catalytic oxidation process under less than atmospheric pressure. While water use at this plant has been minimized—recirculation and atmospheric cooling towers are used-there is a primary wastestream at the plant termed tfye oUy water 402 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 402