page 96 |
Previous | 1 of 9 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Methods for Treating Metal Finishing Wastes HUBERT S. KLINE Director of Industrial Hygiene and Sanitary Engineering, Frigidaire Division General Motors Corporation Dayton, Ohio Rapid progress has been made in the development of methods for industrial waste treatment during the past decade. The situation as it existed in 1945 when the General Motors Industrial Waste Control Committee was organized has changed greatly. This new committee had agreed to meet frequently to review the industrial waste problems of the corporation and to summon experts to discuss the methods of treating industrial wastes, procedures for chemical analysis of waste solutions, and present data on toxicity of certain compounds likely to be found in public water courses. It was soon learned that there were no "experts" on industrial waste treatment at the time. Sanitary engineers were primarily qualified in the field of sewage treatment and knew very little about the problems of industry, particularly those of the electroplaters. Likewise, it was discovered that most of the personnel of the regulatory agencies had very indefinite ideas regarding toxicity or the detrimental effects of metal finishing wastes on stream life and sewage treatment systems. In the framework of this picture of 1945 was the theme that production of war materials came first, and both industry and the general public were so occupied with thoughts of winning the war that there was little time to think of travel, recreation, or peacetime hobbies. At the close of World War II, it was necessary for many plants to discard solutions and materials used for war production in order that they begin to convert to their normal peacetime operations. Public travel restrictions were relaxed and there were many who sought the out-of-doors for recreation and enjoyment. It was then that a great howl was raised to the regulatory authorities to stop further pollution of recreational waters. It required several years for engineers and metal finishing experts to develop means for rendering industrial wastes harmless and during this time the legislators were busy writing laws and regulations to prevent manufacturers from discharging their waste solutions into public water courses. 96
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC195311 |
Title | Methods for treating metal finishing wastes |
Author | Kline, Hubert S. |
Date of Original | 1953 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the eighth Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://earchives.lib.purdue.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/engext&CISOPTR=3119&REC=9 |
Extent of Original | p. 96-104 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2008-09-22 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 96 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Methods for Treating Metal Finishing Wastes HUBERT S. KLINE Director of Industrial Hygiene and Sanitary Engineering, Frigidaire Division General Motors Corporation Dayton, Ohio Rapid progress has been made in the development of methods for industrial waste treatment during the past decade. The situation as it existed in 1945 when the General Motors Industrial Waste Control Committee was organized has changed greatly. This new committee had agreed to meet frequently to review the industrial waste problems of the corporation and to summon experts to discuss the methods of treating industrial wastes, procedures for chemical analysis of waste solutions, and present data on toxicity of certain compounds likely to be found in public water courses. It was soon learned that there were no "experts" on industrial waste treatment at the time. Sanitary engineers were primarily qualified in the field of sewage treatment and knew very little about the problems of industry, particularly those of the electroplaters. Likewise, it was discovered that most of the personnel of the regulatory agencies had very indefinite ideas regarding toxicity or the detrimental effects of metal finishing wastes on stream life and sewage treatment systems. In the framework of this picture of 1945 was the theme that production of war materials came first, and both industry and the general public were so occupied with thoughts of winning the war that there was little time to think of travel, recreation, or peacetime hobbies. At the close of World War II, it was necessary for many plants to discard solutions and materials used for war production in order that they begin to convert to their normal peacetime operations. Public travel restrictions were relaxed and there were many who sought the out-of-doors for recreation and enjoyment. It was then that a great howl was raised to the regulatory authorities to stop further pollution of recreational waters. It required several years for engineers and metal finishing experts to develop means for rendering industrial wastes harmless and during this time the legislators were busy writing laws and regulations to prevent manufacturers from discharging their waste solutions into public water courses. 96 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 96