page 269 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
Section 10. LAUNDRY WASTES TREATMENT OF EMULSIFIED AND COLLOIDAL INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER USING A COMBINED ULTRAFILTRATION— CARBON ADSORPTION PROCESS Gerard J. Van Gils, Director Environmental and Mechanical Engineering Aratex Services, Inc. Encino, California 91316 Massoud Pirbazari, Assistant Professor Sung-Hyun Kim, Research Assistant Department of Civil Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089 Jacob Shorr, President The Memtek Corporation Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 INTRODUCTION The character of wastewater generated by an industrial laundry is a function of the customer group served. The typical industrial laundry (SIC 7218) provides garments and dust control products to the heavy manufacturing industries, the electroplating and automotive industries, battery manufacturers, the service industries, newspapers, printers, auto garages, schools, commercial and retail businesses. From these customers, contaminants such as oils and greases, heavy metals and solvents may be carried in on garments, coveralls, shop towels, mops or track-off mats. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has analyzed laundries and characterized their wastes [1]. Most notable about this characterization is: (1) the ubiquitousness of priority pollutants; and (2) the wide variability in waste concentrations from laundry to laundry. Typical pollutant concentrations for laundry wastewater are presented in Table I. Treatment systems used for the pretreatment of such wastes prior to discharge to publicly owned tteatment works (POTW's) use chemical coagulation and flocculation in conjunction with dissolved air flotation for separation of flocculant solids from the water phase. Vacuum filtration is used to dewater the float solids [1]. These treatment systems are primarily designed to remove heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, copper, zinc and emulsified oils and greases. Dissolved solids, color materials, taste and odor compounds were generally not taken into consideration since the system effluent was most commonly discharged to the POTW and not reused. A previous work [2] using a spirally wound ultrafiltration membrane followed by a fixed bed activated carbon adsorption system was plagued by early fouling of the membranes, low flux rates, and the unsolved problem of ultrafiltration concentrate containing the incompatible pollutants. Additionally, several systems have been studied for treatment of commercial laundry wastes such as in a series of studies by the U.S. Army on the treatment of field laundry wastewaters by chemical coagulants and activated carbon [3] and a study of the ultrafiltration process using a synthetic laundry waste [4]. Ultrafiltration has also been used to treat highly concentrated oil in water emulsions [5]. The Need for Improved Technology Wastewater treatment costs ranged $4.00 to $5.00 per 1000 gallons using the chemical coagulation and dissolved air flotation systems with treatment chemicals comprising the largest component costs of $2.00 to $3.00 per 1000 gallons [6]. Additionally, typical water and sewerage costs were $.60 and $.90, respectively, in 1983 for a total water/wastewater expense of approximately $5.00 to $6.00 per 1,000 gallons for the laundry operator. 269
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198428 |
Title | Treatment of emulsified and colloidal industrial wastewater using a combined ultrafiltration-carbon adsorption process |
Author |
Van Gils, Gerard J. Pirbazari, Massoud Kim, Sung-Hyun Shorr, Jacob |
Date of Original | 1984 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 39th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,35769 |
Extent of Original | p. 269-280 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-16 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 269 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | Section 10. LAUNDRY WASTES TREATMENT OF EMULSIFIED AND COLLOIDAL INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER USING A COMBINED ULTRAFILTRATION— CARBON ADSORPTION PROCESS Gerard J. Van Gils, Director Environmental and Mechanical Engineering Aratex Services, Inc. Encino, California 91316 Massoud Pirbazari, Assistant Professor Sung-Hyun Kim, Research Assistant Department of Civil Engineering University of Southern California Los Angeles, California 90089 Jacob Shorr, President The Memtek Corporation Woburn, Massachusetts 01801 INTRODUCTION The character of wastewater generated by an industrial laundry is a function of the customer group served. The typical industrial laundry (SIC 7218) provides garments and dust control products to the heavy manufacturing industries, the electroplating and automotive industries, battery manufacturers, the service industries, newspapers, printers, auto garages, schools, commercial and retail businesses. From these customers, contaminants such as oils and greases, heavy metals and solvents may be carried in on garments, coveralls, shop towels, mops or track-off mats. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has analyzed laundries and characterized their wastes [1]. Most notable about this characterization is: (1) the ubiquitousness of priority pollutants; and (2) the wide variability in waste concentrations from laundry to laundry. Typical pollutant concentrations for laundry wastewater are presented in Table I. Treatment systems used for the pretreatment of such wastes prior to discharge to publicly owned tteatment works (POTW's) use chemical coagulation and flocculation in conjunction with dissolved air flotation for separation of flocculant solids from the water phase. Vacuum filtration is used to dewater the float solids [1]. These treatment systems are primarily designed to remove heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, copper, zinc and emulsified oils and greases. Dissolved solids, color materials, taste and odor compounds were generally not taken into consideration since the system effluent was most commonly discharged to the POTW and not reused. A previous work [2] using a spirally wound ultrafiltration membrane followed by a fixed bed activated carbon adsorption system was plagued by early fouling of the membranes, low flux rates, and the unsolved problem of ultrafiltration concentrate containing the incompatible pollutants. Additionally, several systems have been studied for treatment of commercial laundry wastes such as in a series of studies by the U.S. Army on the treatment of field laundry wastewaters by chemical coagulants and activated carbon [3] and a study of the ultrafiltration process using a synthetic laundry waste [4]. Ultrafiltration has also been used to treat highly concentrated oil in water emulsions [5]. The Need for Improved Technology Wastewater treatment costs ranged $4.00 to $5.00 per 1000 gallons using the chemical coagulation and dissolved air flotation systems with treatment chemicals comprising the largest component costs of $2.00 to $3.00 per 1000 gallons [6]. Additionally, typical water and sewerage costs were $.60 and $.90, respectively, in 1983 for a total water/wastewater expense of approximately $5.00 to $6.00 per 1,000 gallons for the laundry operator. 269 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 269