page 875 |
Previous | 1 of 18 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
GEOTHERMAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL Robert A. Ryder, Chief Engineer Richard C. Casias, Hydrogeologist Collins & Ryder Consulting Engineers Larkspur, California 94939 INTRODUCTION The development of geothermal heat sources for the production of energy is a rapidly increasing activity in the Western United States that parallels worldwide interest. Major geothermal developments are occurring in usually volcanic-fault regions of the Earth where the underlying 1,000 C heated magma is closer to the Earth's crust. These areas include: Italy, Iceland, New Zealand, Indonesia, Japan, the Phillipines, Mexico, Central America, Hawaii and the United States [1]. In the search for and development of alternative energy sources that has occurred in the past dozen years the stimulant has been rapidly escalating oil prices and the decline in construction of nuclear power facilities. Geothermal energy is often seen as an economically viable choice, particularly where energy produced is purchased at more than 7 cents a kilowatt hour. The heat sources are of several types: • Vapor dominated—dry steam that occurs at the geysers in Northern California, by far the most extensively developed U.S. geothermal field, and a few other places in the world, including Italy. • Water dominated—Hot water that occurs much more often and is usually superheated and at high pressure. Power generation from dry steam is by direct recirculation through steam turbines where the steam loses pressure and heat. Two types of power generation are typical for water dominated geothermal conditions. First by single or multiple flash of the liquid into steam that affords economical energy recovery when the temperature is above 200 C. Organic-Rankine binary cycle heat extractors using either isobutane or Freon as the vaporizing fluid are usually the economical generation processes used if temperatures of hot water are below 200 C. These may be utilized with heat source temperature as low as 70 C and the technology is similar to waste heat recovery or heat pump units. There are other more experimental types including down hole, biphase turbines, and helical expander turbines that have been utilized in experimental development tests [2]. An overview of the known geothermal areas in the Western United States is shown in Figure 1. The power production potential of this area is estimated to be about 30,000 megawatts of known high temperature sources, and 32,000,000 megawatts of medium temperature sources. In perspective this compares to the electrical generating capacity in the United States that is in excess of 500,000 megawatts so geothermal energy is by no means insignificant and within the past dozen years there have been many experimental geothermal test programs sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy to further the use of geothermal energy. California and Nevada are states where most of the commercial exploitation of geothermal energy has occurred. The estimated power potential of some of the geothermal areas in these states are: The Geysers 1,600 MW (dry steam) Long Valley 6,000 Imperial Valley 4,500 Dixie Valley 600 The largest and probably easiest commercial development has occurred at The Geysers where there are now about twenty power plants in operation or under construction that can produce about 1,400 MW of power. More recently there are power plants of 10 to 50 MW capacity being constructed in Long Valley and the Imperial Valley areas. Several major constraints in the development of these 875
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198489 |
Title | Geothermal wastewater treatment and disposal |
Author |
Ryder, Robert A. Casias, Richard C. |
Date of Original | 1984 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 39th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,35769 |
Extent of Original | p. 875-892 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-21 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 875 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | GEOTHERMAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL Robert A. Ryder, Chief Engineer Richard C. Casias, Hydrogeologist Collins & Ryder Consulting Engineers Larkspur, California 94939 INTRODUCTION The development of geothermal heat sources for the production of energy is a rapidly increasing activity in the Western United States that parallels worldwide interest. Major geothermal developments are occurring in usually volcanic-fault regions of the Earth where the underlying 1,000 C heated magma is closer to the Earth's crust. These areas include: Italy, Iceland, New Zealand, Indonesia, Japan, the Phillipines, Mexico, Central America, Hawaii and the United States [1]. In the search for and development of alternative energy sources that has occurred in the past dozen years the stimulant has been rapidly escalating oil prices and the decline in construction of nuclear power facilities. Geothermal energy is often seen as an economically viable choice, particularly where energy produced is purchased at more than 7 cents a kilowatt hour. The heat sources are of several types: • Vapor dominated—dry steam that occurs at the geysers in Northern California, by far the most extensively developed U.S. geothermal field, and a few other places in the world, including Italy. • Water dominated—Hot water that occurs much more often and is usually superheated and at high pressure. Power generation from dry steam is by direct recirculation through steam turbines where the steam loses pressure and heat. Two types of power generation are typical for water dominated geothermal conditions. First by single or multiple flash of the liquid into steam that affords economical energy recovery when the temperature is above 200 C. Organic-Rankine binary cycle heat extractors using either isobutane or Freon as the vaporizing fluid are usually the economical generation processes used if temperatures of hot water are below 200 C. These may be utilized with heat source temperature as low as 70 C and the technology is similar to waste heat recovery or heat pump units. There are other more experimental types including down hole, biphase turbines, and helical expander turbines that have been utilized in experimental development tests [2]. An overview of the known geothermal areas in the Western United States is shown in Figure 1. The power production potential of this area is estimated to be about 30,000 megawatts of known high temperature sources, and 32,000,000 megawatts of medium temperature sources. In perspective this compares to the electrical generating capacity in the United States that is in excess of 500,000 megawatts so geothermal energy is by no means insignificant and within the past dozen years there have been many experimental geothermal test programs sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy to further the use of geothermal energy. California and Nevada are states where most of the commercial exploitation of geothermal energy has occurred. The estimated power potential of some of the geothermal areas in these states are: The Geysers 1,600 MW (dry steam) Long Valley 6,000 Imperial Valley 4,500 Dixie Valley 600 The largest and probably easiest commercial development has occurred at The Geysers where there are now about twenty power plants in operation or under construction that can produce about 1,400 MW of power. More recently there are power plants of 10 to 50 MW capacity being constructed in Long Valley and the Imperial Valley areas. Several major constraints in the development of these 875 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 875