page 213 |
Previous | 1 of 12 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
RECOVERY OF WASTE BRINES FOR HIGHWAY APPLICATIONS William A. Sack, Professor Ronald W. Eck, Professor Department of Civil Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown, WV 26506 Carmen R. Romano, Engineer EG and G-WASC, Inc. Morgantown, WV 26505 INTRODUCTION Waste liquids arising from oil and gas production may be divided into three categories: drilling fluids and muds, chemical treatment fluids and produced brines. This paper focuses on the quality and quantity of produced brines and the potential for recovery of these waste fluids for use in highway applications. Brines are separated from the oil and/or gas as they reach the surface and are often placed in temporary storage at the wellhead. For example, in West Virginia above-ground covered steel or fiberglass tanks designed to hold 100 barrels of brine (4200 gallons) are typically provided. In some states lined or unlined pits or ponds or buried metal or concrete tanks have been utilized for brine storage. However, unlined ponds and buried tanks are often a source of ground water pollution and their use is being discontinued in most states. CURRENT BRINE DISPOSAL PRACTICES Brine disposal practices may be divided into the broad categories of surface discharge, subsurface discharge, evaporation, and roadway application. Approximately 30 states produce some amount of oil and/or natural gas and brine handling practices vary considerably because of variations in climate, geology, brine quantity and quality produced and regulatory framework. Surface discharge of brines to land or surface waters occurs in both an uncontrolled and a controlled manner. Wells are so numerous in some states that it is extremely difficult for regulatory agencies to cope with the problem, and a significant amount of brine is discharged in an uncontrolled manner. For example, Templeton and Associates [1] reported in a survey of brine production and disposal in Ohio that 40,000 barrels per day (BPD) of salt water were produced in 1979, and that 75% (30,000 BPD) were disposed of by unknown means. Controlled surface discharge is practiced in some states where brine may be discharged by simple dilution through an existing municipal or industrial treatment facility. Treatment facilities built solely for oil and gas industry wastes are operational in some states including Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Treatment includes gravity separation of oils, pH adjustment and use of lagoons for aeration and sedimentation prior to discharge in proportion to stream flow. Another type of surface discharge is via ocean disposal as practiced in some coastal states such as Louisiana. Use of subsurface disposal wells for disposal of brine is probably the most widely used controlled method especially in the western and southern oil and gas producing states. Wells may be drilled specifically for disposal or may be dry holes or abandoned wells converted to disposal use. Disposal of brines to subsurface formations to increase reservoir yields via injection wells is also carried out. This practice may be termed water flooding, secondary recovery, or repressuring [2]. Subsurface disposal is the method of choice in states such as Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas. For example, there are approximately 4000 disposal wells and 2000 injection wells in Kansas alone. However, for a number of reasons the use of disposal or injection wells is much less common east of the Mississippi River in states such as West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York. Successful disposal requires the availability of permeable formations sufficiently thick to accom- 213
Object Description
Purdue Identification Number | ETRIWC198523 |
Title | Recovery of waste brine for highway applications |
Author |
Sack, William A. Eck, Ronald W. Romano, Carmen R. |
Date of Original | 1985 |
Conference Title | Proceedings of the 40th Industrial Waste Conference |
Conference Front Matter (copy and paste) | http://e-archives.lib.purdue.edu/u?/engext,36131 |
Extent of Original | p. 213-224 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital object copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Date Digitized | 2009-07-14 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Description
Title | page 213 |
Collection Title | Engineering Technical Reports Collection, Purdue University |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Rights Statement | Digital copyright Purdue University. All rights reserved. |
Language | eng |
Type (DCMI) | text |
Format | JP2 |
Capture Device | Fujitsu fi-5650C |
Capture Details | ScandAll 21 |
Transcript | RECOVERY OF WASTE BRINES FOR HIGHWAY APPLICATIONS William A. Sack, Professor Ronald W. Eck, Professor Department of Civil Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown, WV 26506 Carmen R. Romano, Engineer EG and G-WASC, Inc. Morgantown, WV 26505 INTRODUCTION Waste liquids arising from oil and gas production may be divided into three categories: drilling fluids and muds, chemical treatment fluids and produced brines. This paper focuses on the quality and quantity of produced brines and the potential for recovery of these waste fluids for use in highway applications. Brines are separated from the oil and/or gas as they reach the surface and are often placed in temporary storage at the wellhead. For example, in West Virginia above-ground covered steel or fiberglass tanks designed to hold 100 barrels of brine (4200 gallons) are typically provided. In some states lined or unlined pits or ponds or buried metal or concrete tanks have been utilized for brine storage. However, unlined ponds and buried tanks are often a source of ground water pollution and their use is being discontinued in most states. CURRENT BRINE DISPOSAL PRACTICES Brine disposal practices may be divided into the broad categories of surface discharge, subsurface discharge, evaporation, and roadway application. Approximately 30 states produce some amount of oil and/or natural gas and brine handling practices vary considerably because of variations in climate, geology, brine quantity and quality produced and regulatory framework. Surface discharge of brines to land or surface waters occurs in both an uncontrolled and a controlled manner. Wells are so numerous in some states that it is extremely difficult for regulatory agencies to cope with the problem, and a significant amount of brine is discharged in an uncontrolled manner. For example, Templeton and Associates [1] reported in a survey of brine production and disposal in Ohio that 40,000 barrels per day (BPD) of salt water were produced in 1979, and that 75% (30,000 BPD) were disposed of by unknown means. Controlled surface discharge is practiced in some states where brine may be discharged by simple dilution through an existing municipal or industrial treatment facility. Treatment facilities built solely for oil and gas industry wastes are operational in some states including Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Treatment includes gravity separation of oils, pH adjustment and use of lagoons for aeration and sedimentation prior to discharge in proportion to stream flow. Another type of surface discharge is via ocean disposal as practiced in some coastal states such as Louisiana. Use of subsurface disposal wells for disposal of brine is probably the most widely used controlled method especially in the western and southern oil and gas producing states. Wells may be drilled specifically for disposal or may be dry holes or abandoned wells converted to disposal use. Disposal of brines to subsurface formations to increase reservoir yields via injection wells is also carried out. This practice may be termed water flooding, secondary recovery, or repressuring [2]. Subsurface disposal is the method of choice in states such as Kansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas. For example, there are approximately 4000 disposal wells and 2000 injection wells in Kansas alone. However, for a number of reasons the use of disposal or injection wells is much less common east of the Mississippi River in states such as West Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York. Successful disposal requires the availability of permeable formations sufficiently thick to accom- 213 |
Resolution | 300 ppi |
Color Depth | 8 bit |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for page 213