Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 18 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
. 'A ' 70L. XIX. INDIANAPOLIS, IND., SATURDAY, MAY 3,1884. NO. 18. HMJHA WOOL GROWERS. vi.-liu.nal Meeting—Sheep Shearing Festival. The members ot the Indiana Wool Grow- ,V Association held a regular semi-an- :_il meeting in one of the rooms at the fiposition Building on Wednesday of ist week. There was an average attend- 3-e, but it was evident that the majority ,_ie there to attend the sheep shearing .tival, not thinking the meeting was to ■a held in connection therewith. After ■ouie discussion it was agreed to go into regular session. Accordingly President C. T. Mion took the chair and called for the pron-am. As the meeting was unexpected ;„e program that had been announced ..mil not be followed, and so it was con- •_n_ed over to the next meeting, to be :.]_in January, with but one change, rit: that Mr. I. N. Cotton will take the -lice of Mr. Nixon as essayist. The present called upon a number of those present for their experience with .;,'-; . SHKEP DUB-NO THK PAST WINTER." They replied as follows: , I. E. McGaughey.Harion Co.: My sheep bsve gone through the winter in an excellent manner. Twenty of my ewes had 28 limbs, of which I lost eight; the rest are ill right. I think my sheep are somewhat muMed with ticks. I wintered them i*out hay stacks, without any other shelter, till lambing time, when I put my ewes under the shelter of a roof. A neighbor (mine with 80 ewes saved but 32 lambs, ind I attribute his loss to the entire absence of shelter for his flock. I keep a aiitureof Cotswolds and Southdowns. Last year they averaged 9% pounds of wool at dipping; do not think they will doquitesowellthisspring. Some of them hire lost a little wool in spots, from what ittse I do not know. J. (i. Byars, Simpson ville, Ky.: My .lick of Southdowns did as well last winter as I ever had any sheep do. They ire in excellent condition and thrifty. I .-lowed them to run out in favorable weather, but sheltered them at the lambing season and in stormy weather. The Limbs came mostly in February. I always breed for that month and think it the best, ill things considered. About 10 per cent '( the lambS were lost. I have found »>me ticks upon my sheep and will dip ihem as soon as shorn. -. Thomas Nelson, Parke Co.: I have 100 ffi-tton sheep and 100 last year's lambs wd breeding ewes. They have been out n the weather all winter, except at nights ia lambing time, and have done well. lhey are kept in three separate flocks.con- sisting of lambs, ewes and mutton sheep. lo breeding, I placed a Merino buck with v> ewes last fall, allowing him to' run with •hem two days and keeping him out two, Ornately, for 20 days. My lambs come 'Jie last of April, and so fat I have lost but we. 1 gave my sheep rough feed through lbe winter, and on the first of March be- pn feeding grain. I will shear early and pat my mutton sheep on the market in fee and July. The wool average from aJ flock will be about 8}_ or 9 pounds. f» sheep have been considerably troubled with ticks, which I think is due to the wet weather. This sheep shearing festival is, in my opinion, a good thing. We had one in onr county once, and it awakened a great interest in the business and quite a demand for sheep. The reduction of the tariff had a very depressing . effect upon the wool business. The bill introduced in the House by Mr. Converse, of Ohio, was about the right thing but was brought forward at the wrong time. It should have been wltheld till after the defeat of the Morrison bill, which I consider certain. Mortimer Levering, Tippecanoe Co.: We have 400 sheep, and keep a register of all sheep, both ewes and lambs. All dates (of birth etc.,) are properly recorded, and by rpfering to our books we can tell the history of any animal in our flock. Only 60 per cent of our ewes got with lamb. At breeding we put the ram with the ewes at night only, and it may be owing to this fact that so many of them failed. About 10 per cent of the lambs were lost. 'The. Shropshires have more twins than Cotswolds. Our new Shropshire Association promises well. There, is a great interest in this class of sheep and the success of the society seems assured. Next year the Association will exhibit some sheep at the shearing festival, if one is to be held. Jacob Whitesell, Marion C».: - I have cross bred Cotswolds and Southdowns. They were wintered on corn fodder, and came out well, although they are s ome- what troubled with ticks. S. R. Quick,Bartholomew Co.: Some of my lambs came in January and Febuary; of these I lost 40 per cent, and the rest are doing well. Other lambs came in last of March and first of April; of these I saved 90 per cent, and they are in better condition than the earlier ones. My Cotswolds are losing their wool, which is due,I think, to the ticks, of which there are more than common. The outlook for prices is not good. Buyers in our county are offering to engage wool for 16 @ 17 cents a ponnd. Last year we obtained 22 cents, but this was partly the result of an organization by the farmers of the section, who sold their wool in bulk and thus got an advance of two or three cents for it. We cannot raise sheep for wool alone at 17 cents, but for wool mutton, with a fair price for the latter and 17 cents for the wool, the business can be made pi o Stable. As a preventive against ticks I feed my' sheep sulphur with their salt. I leave the salt and sulphur, mixed, where they can get at it at all times. This year I neglected the use of sulphur and my sheep have been troubled with ticks for the first time in several years. Mr. Byars: I use the same remedy and with satisfactory results. In Kentucky we are offered 20 @ 23 cents for our wool, which seems to be four or five cents better than your offers here. , Indianapolis: I was four years in the sheep business in Texas. I started on a small scale with 125 head of Merinos. Four years after, I sold 600 sheep at $4.25 a head. Last year was very severe on Texas sheep, as there was very little pasture. My lambs came about the first of March and I lost a good many. I lost J600 on my flock. One man lost $1,000 in lambs. As they never feed their sheep the Texas wool growers always suffer great loss when grass fails, as it did this year. It is best to keep mutton sheep here and wool sheep in Texas. "The sheep business there has heretofore been better and easier than the cattle business, but. now the former is rather depressed and not so surely profitable. J. ___.. Thompson, Grant Co.; The cold weather coming so suddenly last fall made the past winter unusually hard.on sheep. I lost more sheep and raised less lambs than generally. The dogs got away with a good many sheep. Usually our farmers get 26 @27 cents for their wool. The tariff reduction has had a bad effect, and this year I don't think we can get more than 20@ 23 cents per pound. The decrease in tariff and the recent uncertainty in regard to legislative action have both conspired to lower the value of wool. In Grant county, many sheep raisers sold out last year and many more will do so this year. They are discouraged and have given the business up. I am by no means discouraged, though undoubtedly the outlook is not as promising as it might be, and I shall continue to raise sheep as long as I can see hope in the future. Col. Fielding Beeler, Marion Co.: The past season was unusually hard on sheep, and I lost a great many lambs. My ewes don't seem to have enough milk. The grass last fall didn't seem to have any substance to it; it was watery and washy and caused a deal of scouring. The outlook is discouraging. The lowering of the tariff has hada damaging effect,but it is not alone to blame. The Increase in wool production of Australia and in our own country has had much to do with it. Mr. Thompson: Every man ought to keep a few sheep whether he realizes anything on wool or not. They will pay for themselves in other ways. To keep a great many at a profit he must make something on wool. Uriah Privett, Decatur Co.: We need not be discouraged yet, though the prospect is not as bright as it might be. I think the shearing festival will have a good effect in stirring up the interest In sheep. Col. Beeler: I doubt whether sheep as a specialty on high priced Indiana land will pay, but every man ought to keep a few as gleaners. C. T. Nixon, Marion Co.: Much has been said about ticks. I think it is not always ticks that cause the difficulty. A neighbor of mine found hundreds of lice on his sheep. Another found the same pests, which came, he thought, from some wool sacks he had obtained frem the West. I think the wool falling off is caused by these lice, rather than by ticks. E. S. .Butler, Ridgeway, O.: My breeding sheep are Merinos. My losses this year have not exceeded one per cent, although the losses in the State have been comparatively heavy. As a remedy for ticks I sprinkle sulphur on affected sheep, being careful to select a dry, warm day for the purpose. Mr. Harkless, Henry Co.: My success haa been better this winter than usual. My young sheep have some ticks which I will destroy after shearing by dipping. I breed to have lambs come in February. I feed under shelter and give bran, corn and oats, always feeding the ewes well just before lambing, In order to give the lambs a vigorous start. My sheep last year averaged 11 pounds of wool. To prepare a dip for ticks, I make tobacco ooze in a tub, making it strong enough to kill a tick, "but not strong enough to make a lamb sick. J. Q. Prigg, Henry Co.: There are a good many ticks on my sheep which came from : some new ones I bought. I use prepared carbolic dip in a coal-oil barrel and rarely have any trouble with them. Last fall was a bad preparation for winter. The grass was washy and not nutritious. I have lost 40 percentof Iambs this years; the rest of my sheep are in good fix. TOBACCO DIP. Mr. Byars: I use a tobacco dip for both sheep and lambs. Mr. Privett: I use one pound of steins to three gallons of water for the dip, make it as hot as the sheep can bear it, and dip soon after shearing. C. A. Howland, Marion Co.: My sheep are full of ticks, although I dipped them soon after shearing last spring. It Is good policy to make the dip strong. Col. Beeler: You can kill lambs by having it too strong, as I know by experience. Mr. Levering: I dip every year, and don't think I can can -well make the dip too strong. I have a regular tank and dip the whole sheep in it, holding the hand over its nose. TARIFF. Mr. Howland: I wish to say a word about the tariff. When the reduction was made on wool, it was at the same time retained on the manufactured goods, and so the wool grower loses and the manufacturer gains. Still the tariff is not the only depressing factor. Wool has declined, but so has wheat, and the reason is the same in both cases; the demand is less than the supply. If the"tariff on the manufactured goods were lowered to correspond with the reduction on wool, it would not hurt the sheep raiser at all. If he keeps not more than 100 sheep he will save the difference in the clothes he buys. I am not a free trade man, but I want a tariff for revenue placed where it will protect the weakest industry. Mr. Nixon presented a resolution in- dorsing,ln the strongest terms, Hon. G. L. Converse, of Ohio, for his effort in Congress to restore the duty on wool, and thanking the Indiana members who supported the bill. The resolution was unanimously adopted. I. Thalman, of C. E. Gelsendorffd. Co.: Indiana as a wool growing State now ranks about as high as any other, and by agitating the subject may be made to take the first place. Some States raise finer wools, but for medium and medium long Indiana cannot be beaten. Our wools are growing in favor everywhere. Ohio and Pennsylvania wool growers generally take better care of their sheep than those of Indiana and so have cleaner wool, but no better than we can produce with the same care. The prospect is that prices will be about the same this year as last. I don't think the tariff will be changed, and nothing else is likely to change values, so far as can be seen now. As to what kind of wool to raise, I would not advise any particular one. Styles are constantly changing, and every new style creates a demand for some special grade of wool. We can- riot predict the styles and so we cannot say what grade of wool will be most in demand at a given future time. CONCLUDED ON FOURTH PAOE.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1884, v. 19, no. 18 (May 3) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA1918 |
Date of Original | 1884 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2010-11-15 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript | . 'A ' 70L. XIX. INDIANAPOLIS, IND., SATURDAY, MAY 3,1884. NO. 18. HMJHA WOOL GROWERS. vi.-liu.nal Meeting—Sheep Shearing Festival. The members ot the Indiana Wool Grow- ,V Association held a regular semi-an- :_il meeting in one of the rooms at the fiposition Building on Wednesday of ist week. There was an average attend- 3-e, but it was evident that the majority ,_ie there to attend the sheep shearing .tival, not thinking the meeting was to ■a held in connection therewith. After ■ouie discussion it was agreed to go into regular session. Accordingly President C. T. Mion took the chair and called for the pron-am. As the meeting was unexpected ;„e program that had been announced ..mil not be followed, and so it was con- •_n_ed over to the next meeting, to be :.]_in January, with but one change, rit: that Mr. I. N. Cotton will take the -lice of Mr. Nixon as essayist. The present called upon a number of those present for their experience with .;,'-; . SHKEP DUB-NO THK PAST WINTER." They replied as follows: , I. E. McGaughey.Harion Co.: My sheep bsve gone through the winter in an excellent manner. Twenty of my ewes had 28 limbs, of which I lost eight; the rest are ill right. I think my sheep are somewhat muMed with ticks. I wintered them i*out hay stacks, without any other shelter, till lambing time, when I put my ewes under the shelter of a roof. A neighbor (mine with 80 ewes saved but 32 lambs, ind I attribute his loss to the entire absence of shelter for his flock. I keep a aiitureof Cotswolds and Southdowns. Last year they averaged 9% pounds of wool at dipping; do not think they will doquitesowellthisspring. Some of them hire lost a little wool in spots, from what ittse I do not know. J. (i. Byars, Simpson ville, Ky.: My .lick of Southdowns did as well last winter as I ever had any sheep do. They ire in excellent condition and thrifty. I .-lowed them to run out in favorable weather, but sheltered them at the lambing season and in stormy weather. The Limbs came mostly in February. I always breed for that month and think it the best, ill things considered. About 10 per cent '( the lambS were lost. I have found »>me ticks upon my sheep and will dip ihem as soon as shorn. -. Thomas Nelson, Parke Co.: I have 100 ffi-tton sheep and 100 last year's lambs wd breeding ewes. They have been out n the weather all winter, except at nights ia lambing time, and have done well. lhey are kept in three separate flocks.con- sisting of lambs, ewes and mutton sheep. lo breeding, I placed a Merino buck with v> ewes last fall, allowing him to' run with •hem two days and keeping him out two, Ornately, for 20 days. My lambs come 'Jie last of April, and so fat I have lost but we. 1 gave my sheep rough feed through lbe winter, and on the first of March be- pn feeding grain. I will shear early and pat my mutton sheep on the market in fee and July. The wool average from aJ flock will be about 8}_ or 9 pounds. f» sheep have been considerably troubled with ticks, which I think is due to the wet weather. This sheep shearing festival is, in my opinion, a good thing. We had one in onr county once, and it awakened a great interest in the business and quite a demand for sheep. The reduction of the tariff had a very depressing . effect upon the wool business. The bill introduced in the House by Mr. Converse, of Ohio, was about the right thing but was brought forward at the wrong time. It should have been wltheld till after the defeat of the Morrison bill, which I consider certain. Mortimer Levering, Tippecanoe Co.: We have 400 sheep, and keep a register of all sheep, both ewes and lambs. All dates (of birth etc.,) are properly recorded, and by rpfering to our books we can tell the history of any animal in our flock. Only 60 per cent of our ewes got with lamb. At breeding we put the ram with the ewes at night only, and it may be owing to this fact that so many of them failed. About 10 per cent of the lambs were lost. 'The. Shropshires have more twins than Cotswolds. Our new Shropshire Association promises well. There, is a great interest in this class of sheep and the success of the society seems assured. Next year the Association will exhibit some sheep at the shearing festival, if one is to be held. Jacob Whitesell, Marion C».: - I have cross bred Cotswolds and Southdowns. They were wintered on corn fodder, and came out well, although they are s ome- what troubled with ticks. S. R. Quick,Bartholomew Co.: Some of my lambs came in January and Febuary; of these I lost 40 per cent, and the rest are doing well. Other lambs came in last of March and first of April; of these I saved 90 per cent, and they are in better condition than the earlier ones. My Cotswolds are losing their wool, which is due,I think, to the ticks, of which there are more than common. The outlook for prices is not good. Buyers in our county are offering to engage wool for 16 @ 17 cents a ponnd. Last year we obtained 22 cents, but this was partly the result of an organization by the farmers of the section, who sold their wool in bulk and thus got an advance of two or three cents for it. We cannot raise sheep for wool alone at 17 cents, but for wool mutton, with a fair price for the latter and 17 cents for the wool, the business can be made pi o Stable. As a preventive against ticks I feed my' sheep sulphur with their salt. I leave the salt and sulphur, mixed, where they can get at it at all times. This year I neglected the use of sulphur and my sheep have been troubled with ticks for the first time in several years. Mr. Byars: I use the same remedy and with satisfactory results. In Kentucky we are offered 20 @ 23 cents for our wool, which seems to be four or five cents better than your offers here. , Indianapolis: I was four years in the sheep business in Texas. I started on a small scale with 125 head of Merinos. Four years after, I sold 600 sheep at $4.25 a head. Last year was very severe on Texas sheep, as there was very little pasture. My lambs came about the first of March and I lost a good many. I lost J600 on my flock. One man lost $1,000 in lambs. As they never feed their sheep the Texas wool growers always suffer great loss when grass fails, as it did this year. It is best to keep mutton sheep here and wool sheep in Texas. "The sheep business there has heretofore been better and easier than the cattle business, but. now the former is rather depressed and not so surely profitable. J. ___.. Thompson, Grant Co.; The cold weather coming so suddenly last fall made the past winter unusually hard.on sheep. I lost more sheep and raised less lambs than generally. The dogs got away with a good many sheep. Usually our farmers get 26 @27 cents for their wool. The tariff reduction has had a bad effect, and this year I don't think we can get more than 20@ 23 cents per pound. The decrease in tariff and the recent uncertainty in regard to legislative action have both conspired to lower the value of wool. In Grant county, many sheep raisers sold out last year and many more will do so this year. They are discouraged and have given the business up. I am by no means discouraged, though undoubtedly the outlook is not as promising as it might be, and I shall continue to raise sheep as long as I can see hope in the future. Col. Fielding Beeler, Marion Co.: The past season was unusually hard on sheep, and I lost a great many lambs. My ewes don't seem to have enough milk. The grass last fall didn't seem to have any substance to it; it was watery and washy and caused a deal of scouring. The outlook is discouraging. The lowering of the tariff has hada damaging effect,but it is not alone to blame. The Increase in wool production of Australia and in our own country has had much to do with it. Mr. Thompson: Every man ought to keep a few sheep whether he realizes anything on wool or not. They will pay for themselves in other ways. To keep a great many at a profit he must make something on wool. Uriah Privett, Decatur Co.: We need not be discouraged yet, though the prospect is not as bright as it might be. I think the shearing festival will have a good effect in stirring up the interest In sheep. Col. Beeler: I doubt whether sheep as a specialty on high priced Indiana land will pay, but every man ought to keep a few as gleaners. C. T. Nixon, Marion Co.: Much has been said about ticks. I think it is not always ticks that cause the difficulty. A neighbor of mine found hundreds of lice on his sheep. Another found the same pests, which came, he thought, from some wool sacks he had obtained frem the West. I think the wool falling off is caused by these lice, rather than by ticks. E. S. .Butler, Ridgeway, O.: My breeding sheep are Merinos. My losses this year have not exceeded one per cent, although the losses in the State have been comparatively heavy. As a remedy for ticks I sprinkle sulphur on affected sheep, being careful to select a dry, warm day for the purpose. Mr. Harkless, Henry Co.: My success haa been better this winter than usual. My young sheep have some ticks which I will destroy after shearing by dipping. I breed to have lambs come in February. I feed under shelter and give bran, corn and oats, always feeding the ewes well just before lambing, In order to give the lambs a vigorous start. My sheep last year averaged 11 pounds of wool. To prepare a dip for ticks, I make tobacco ooze in a tub, making it strong enough to kill a tick, "but not strong enough to make a lamb sick. J. Q. Prigg, Henry Co.: There are a good many ticks on my sheep which came from : some new ones I bought. I use prepared carbolic dip in a coal-oil barrel and rarely have any trouble with them. Last fall was a bad preparation for winter. The grass was washy and not nutritious. I have lost 40 percentof Iambs this years; the rest of my sheep are in good fix. TOBACCO DIP. Mr. Byars: I use a tobacco dip for both sheep and lambs. Mr. Privett: I use one pound of steins to three gallons of water for the dip, make it as hot as the sheep can bear it, and dip soon after shearing. C. A. Howland, Marion Co.: My sheep are full of ticks, although I dipped them soon after shearing last spring. It Is good policy to make the dip strong. Col. Beeler: You can kill lambs by having it too strong, as I know by experience. Mr. Levering: I dip every year, and don't think I can can -well make the dip too strong. I have a regular tank and dip the whole sheep in it, holding the hand over its nose. TARIFF. Mr. Howland: I wish to say a word about the tariff. When the reduction was made on wool, it was at the same time retained on the manufactured goods, and so the wool grower loses and the manufacturer gains. Still the tariff is not the only depressing factor. Wool has declined, but so has wheat, and the reason is the same in both cases; the demand is less than the supply. If the"tariff on the manufactured goods were lowered to correspond with the reduction on wool, it would not hurt the sheep raiser at all. If he keeps not more than 100 sheep he will save the difference in the clothes he buys. I am not a free trade man, but I want a tariff for revenue placed where it will protect the weakest industry. Mr. Nixon presented a resolution in- dorsing,ln the strongest terms, Hon. G. L. Converse, of Ohio, for his effort in Congress to restore the duty on wool, and thanking the Indiana members who supported the bill. The resolution was unanimously adopted. I. Thalman, of C. E. Gelsendorffd. Co.: Indiana as a wool growing State now ranks about as high as any other, and by agitating the subject may be made to take the first place. Some States raise finer wools, but for medium and medium long Indiana cannot be beaten. Our wools are growing in favor everywhere. Ohio and Pennsylvania wool growers generally take better care of their sheep than those of Indiana and so have cleaner wool, but no better than we can produce with the same care. The prospect is that prices will be about the same this year as last. I don't think the tariff will be changed, and nothing else is likely to change values, so far as can be seen now. As to what kind of wool to raise, I would not advise any particular one. Styles are constantly changing, and every new style creates a demand for some special grade of wool. We can- riot predict the styles and so we cannot say what grade of wool will be most in demand at a given future time. CONCLUDED ON FOURTH PAOE. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1