Page 1 |
Previous | 1 of 16 | Next |
|
|
Loading content ...
1 •1 VOL. XXXI. INDIANAPOLIS, IND., MAY 16, 1896. NO. 20 EXPERIENCE DEPARTMENT. Do Ton Prefer Mutual Insurance or Stock Companies, and why? lst premium. As a farmer I prefer mutual or co operative insurance for the following reasons: First,it is less expensive; second,it is safer insurance; third, ite equity; fourth, it retains all the money paid out for insurance at home, and when paid out by the insured it goes directly to the one sustaining a loss. As some of the reasons for the above facts I would mention the following: There are no high salaried officers to pay; no agents to pay; no concentrate! risks where a general conflagration may bankrupt the com- | piny. Then the insured receives the benefit therefrom by simply paying his proportion of the actual cost of insurance snd the money being retained at home will be used to build up and improve our own section of the country. Boone Co. A. S. Campbell. 2d Premium.—Theoretically mutual insurance is preferable. Whetheror not experience confirms this view is another question. The principle of co-operation implied is -discounted by ,the lack .of i fixed and competent direction and man- igement. Directors and officers are con- I itantly changing with little regard.to ex- I perience and competency.' .Tjie. simplest llojm--.lmntu»-r»UfesUi»U-«Bb<>« isperhap^ 1 safe/it is operated over a small territory^ ita minimum of expense and seeks no accumulations for investment or fraud. Tbis kind of insurance in practice seems it no discount as .compared with stock insurance.* It lacks, however, the principle of perpetuity which - stock companies | possess to a considerable degree. The latter Have the advantage in operating on a I large scale and in seeking accumulations tor investment. They are organized as a rule by persons of business aptitude and experience. They organize to secure investment for their own capital and not infrequently to provide portions for themselves or others. They have great interests at stake financially and otherwise. This practically insures good direction and management and perpetuity. Versus this: They name officers and fix salaries; a multitude of subordinates and agents are employed—the business is operated over a vast territory;, there are numerous rents and incidentals all tending to great expense and consequent excessive premiums. All said it waa perhaps wiser to risk old line stock insurance. It is hoped mutual insurance will yet prove the better in practice J as well as in seeming. X. Y. Clark Co. We have a Farmers' Mutual Insurance I Co. in Steuben county that was organized I In 1878, and has increased each year until I we now have about two million dollars' I worth of property insured. We have one I Erector in each township. He is the au- I tocrized agent in his township to take ap- I Plications tor insurance. When the company has a loss they borrow the money I tod pay it, and make assessments once a pear to cover all losses and expenses. We 1 find this much better than to make assessments after each loss. I prefer mutual in- I'-rance because it is cheaper and our l**oney stays at home and we pay a small Ijmonnt each year instead of paying all in jWvance, as in stock companies. Each l*~*mber Sets a notice of the losses for the I ?~ar and he knows when* he pays his as- I'M-mentthatit goes to pay his neigh- lllrn8 l0S8' ■*'costa about *-° centson 6ftoh I'-ooinsnred, a year. John Harpham. !5t"uben Co. - REVIEW. ' Ibiu P0S01-0 °~~e doubts for a moment l~osi<_i'>at -m-tttal stock companies com- I « of farmers of any one county are absolutely safe. The only question is that of cost* and efficiency. These will depend on the local talent and the plan adopted. Counties do not hesitate to grapple with larger problems such as building costly courthouses and bridges, etc., for lack of business talent. There is nothing very complicated in a plan of local mutual Insurance. One danger lies in friendly personal influence taking property too high or assessing loss too high. One must also expect greater extremes as the amount of risks is smaller. We may pay 40 cents one year and 11 cents another and sometimes no assessment at all. We like one "agent" better than on, for each township, and our home company often borrows money or makes an assessment overrun a little to avoid too frequent collections. Our policy covers barns and contents instead of naming each thing contained. Also we may add, say 1,000 bushels of wheat in granary at threshing time and when we sell can have it removed so as to carry the risk only while needed. It is so often that stock companies send agents who seem to quibble and cut out several things by technicalities and then after delay offer to pay with a heavy discount for cash. Our company will adjust a claim, in a week and deposit your full amount due in spot cash to be of immediate use for rebuilding. I have before me the Rosendale company's '21st. statement,, Fo__jd-__JDu.<rJ-s!_e _jk&fss--._jsili .niLt,*, *r^t-$—*i~*t.~,tz--f~?"&-m ^TI~_&r--^-"r-". -i;r c-fanfyyWls.-' Amount in force Dec. 31, '95, $1,409,852; losses and expenses '95, $4,093^8. They claim "to insure against fire and lightening at less than one half the usual rates charged by stock companies." Our Hamilton County. Mutual has cost 23 7-11 cents on the JlOOyearly for the past 11 years. Madison county (I don't have report for '95) cost 13% cents per $100 average for eight years, or $4 05 on $1,000 for three years. "The usual premium of stock companies for farm risks is one per cent or $10 on the thousand for three years. I once wished to change my insurance on personal property on account of moving and it required weeks of correspondence to get every little condition described and satisfied. Now I would jump on my wheel and visit our actuary and arrange everything as I want it and be home to dinner. An enormous amount of money is drained out of this State to agents and Eastern companies every year.' Why not do our own business" and keep our money at home as well as to send away and pay. big prices to fat offices abroad for a less satisfactory service. ' E. H. Collins. No. 13, May 23. How do you cultivate potatoes? " ,No. 14, May 30. Growing millet, sowing, etc. . No. 15, June 6. Cutting and curing hay. Early Vegetables in Florida. The vegetable crops of this country were materially damaged by heavy rains on the 28th. They began on the night of the 27th and continued until noon of the 28th. A considerable amount of the crops were in ponds,and were completely submerged. Those on higher lands are beaten down and the sand washed upon it. A frost on the night of the 25th, in a few instances did great damage. However, ' from favorable locations, shipments are made daily. While tomatoes in some fields are fruiting, in others they are just replanting and transplanting. I see you propose to plant your Colony in Florida. I feel that standing room in this wonderful climate would be thousands of dollars to me; in fact has been, and I am anxious to visit the location selected ; and would be under obligations if you will send circulars to my address, Pwensville,.Indiana. T.S.P. Palmetto, Fla, March 2. Cost of Growing Oorn—The Corn Shredder. Edi-toes Indian.. Fabhkb: I send you the result of keeping an account of the cost of producing a field of corn, containing 14 acres. , I kept an account of time in breaking, pulverizing, planting, cultivating, harvesting, etc., and charged for the same snch costs as the labor could be hired for in this locality and board themselves. I could give an itemized account, but will not take the space. The land, 14 acres, was valued at $40 per acre and a charge of 8 per cent interest was made on the investment. Cost of corn In crib per bushel was 19 cents of 620 bushels to lhe field. The fodder was estimated at 21 tons or about one and one-half tons per acre, and cost in the mow $3 41 per ton. The corn being husked by a "corn husker." This Is the cost should I have hired everything done. The fodder cost in cash, not including any of my own labor or labor swapped for or boarding hands, etc., $193 per ton. The total cost of corn in crib and fodder in mow, including the 8 per cent Interest was $192 20. The value of the corn at 25 cents per bushel and the fodder at $4 per ton was $239, leaving a profit on the 14 acres of $46 80, saying nothing about loss of soil fertility, or barn-yard manure applied to the field. The fodder to be worth :ftC~R"»C-^*w^tte';v'iO?.a^ouldJli-we_t-iJha worth $7 38 per ton. This would increase the profit somewhat. One'thing about the account showed the difference between* estimating and knowing. When the corn' was being husked'it was estimated by good farmers at GO bushels per acre. But.when the corn and land both were measured it was found to yield only a fraction over 44 bushels per acre. Now about the corn husker: I have, with three others, been operating a machine for four years and am of the opinion they are not the machine we want, although they do the work well enough. They are too slow and the principle of the machine so far debars, them from being a speedy machine, making our corn fodder too expensive. And besides the danger of operating the machine is entirely too great.: AVe cannot afford to have such an army of men crippled for life for the sake of having our corn fodder worked up. The plan of feeding the machine has little to do with the danger, as most of the injuries are received by unchoking the machine, and whether one uses a stalk or wooden device made for the purpose, which is much better to un- choke the machine, the operator will find himself getting careless at times, and then is when the accident is most liable to occur, coming too sudden to give any warning. Although we have run four years without an accident of any kind, the next 15 minutes' run may bring the loss of a hand. They must be changed some way for safety and speed or discarded entirely. Chas. It, Hawkins, Franklin Co. POSTAL 0AED 00BBESP0NDEN0E. Mulching Potatoes. Editors Indiana Farmkr: I saw an inquiry about mulching in the Farmer some time since. It is practiced here a great deal on potatoes. Our winds dry the surface rapidly and cause rapid evaporation where the ground is bare. Where there is a slight mulch of straw, dead weeds, or any similar covering, the evaporation is slow." We usually plant : early . varieties and leave the ground bare until the potatoes begin "to break through the soil; then we cover the ground six or eight inches deep with old straw and let them alone until digging time. If it isa dry season they will yield twice as many potatoes as where they are not mulched. D, M. A. Rome, Kans. LaPorte Co., May 8.—Nice growing weather,though rather warm for May; 82 and 86 degrees nearly every day; no rain this week and roads getting dusty; not many pears but lots of apples, peaches, plums and cherries, and they are now as large as good white beans; early potatoes are up and look well and no "bugs" yet, but plenty of insects on the fruit trees. Some are learning to spray their fruit, with good results too. Wish we could have a law like that of Michigan, compelling all to spray. Mrs. B. A. Davis. Kosciusko Co,, May 18.—I was sur-^ prised to receive 200 golden vineless sweet potato plants, very nice ones too, and I set them out to-day. Many thanks to the Huntington Seed Co. and the Farmer Co., for the favor. I shall ever remember all concerned. The weather is quite warm and the wheat is in the boot; rye is heading out; some corn planted; fruit trees all very full. G. B. -V •P •0 S Harrison Co., May 4.—Four inches of rain fell here last Friday night which ended a long drouth; no. corn has been planted yet on account of the cut worms. We got through plowing while the dry weather lasted; since the rain the ground is in fine order to work; stock is in good fix;,lots efJjiogs_.,ar'_*/ bftlng fed. foi" thp June market; wheat is looking well considering the dry weather. WheatOlcents, hogs $2 75, chickens 5*4 cents, eggs 5 cents - butter 8 cents;.barley was all^frozen out. ■-, '. . ■--, .ii B.W. ■■ Clare Co. May 8.—The prospects for a ' cropof wheat are the poorest, known in «. this section for 40 years; it is now beginning to head and the best I have seen is not over one foot in height; it is very thin on the ground as the severe drouth of the last six weeks has prevented stooling. - This is where fertilizers have been used) and wheat where it has not been used can hardly be seen; a great deal of.it will never be harvested; about 40 per cent of a crop. J. D. K. Complimentary. Editobs India*a Fabmeb: I am a reader of the Farmer, and don't see how any successful farmer can do without it. G. M. K. Adams Co. Editobs Indiana Fabmeb: Another old subscriber, H. S. Blatchley In Putnam county, writes us: "The Farmer grows better all the time, and is worth more to one than all the rest of the agricultural papers I ever read." Editobs Indiana Fabhkb: It is hard to make people believe the value of the Farmer. I could not do without the Indiana Farmer. I do not care for the political papers. Clinton Co. Thos. L. Mills. Editors Indiana Fabhkb: I have been a subscriber of your paper for more than two years, and do not want to miss a single number. I can't get along without it. J. W. J. Manager Spring Water Stock Farm. Hope. •Editors Indiana Fabhkb: I am fond of the Farmer and can't see how I could do without it, although I?am 75 years old. My wife was 75 yesterday and we had a family reunion and had quite an enjoyable time. Tipton Co. Simeoi-t Clem. There are now 1,062,700 miles of telegraph lines in existence, more than half of them, 545,600 miles, being in America. Europe has 380,700 miles, Asia 67,400, Australia 47,500, and Africa 21,500. The United States leads the list of countries with 403,- 900 miles, with Russia second.
Object Description
Title | Indiana farmer, 1896, v. 31, no. 20 (May 16) |
Purdue Identification Number | INFA3120 |
Date of Original | 1896 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | United States - Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or not-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Date Digitized | 2011-02-24 |
Digitization Information | Original scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Description
Title | Page 1 |
Subjects (LCSH) |
Agriculture Farm management Horticulture Agricultural machinery |
Subjects (NALT) |
agriculture farm management horticulture agricultural machinery and equipment |
Genre | Periodical |
Call Number of Original | 630.5 In2 |
Location of Original | Hicks Repository |
Coverage | Indiana |
Type | text |
Format | JP2 |
Language | eng |
Collection Title | Indiana Farmer |
Rights Statement | Content in the Indiana Farmer Collection is in the public domain (published before 1923) or lacks a known copyright holder. Digital images in the collection may be used for educational, non-commercial, or non-for-profit purposes. |
Repository | Purdue University Libraries |
Digitization Information | Orignal scanned at 300 ppi on a Bookeye 3 scanner using internal software. Display images generated in CONTENTdm as JP2000s; file format for archival copy is uncompressed TIF format. |
Transcript |
1
•1
VOL. XXXI.
INDIANAPOLIS, IND., MAY 16, 1896.
NO. 20
EXPERIENCE DEPARTMENT.
Do Ton Prefer Mutual Insurance or
Stock Companies, and why?
lst premium. As a farmer I prefer mutual or co operative insurance for the following reasons: First,it is less expensive;
second,it is safer insurance; third, ite
equity; fourth, it retains all the money
paid out for insurance at home, and when
paid out by the insured it goes directly to
the one sustaining a loss. As some of the
reasons for the above facts I would mention the following: There are no high
salaried officers to pay; no agents to pay;
no concentrate! risks where a general
conflagration may bankrupt the com-
| piny. Then the insured receives the
benefit therefrom by simply paying his
proportion of the actual cost of insurance
snd the money being retained at home
will be used to build up and improve our
own section of the country.
Boone Co. A. S. Campbell.
2d Premium.—Theoretically mutual insurance is preferable. Whetheror not experience confirms this view is another
question. The principle of co-operation
implied is -discounted by ,the lack .of
i fixed and competent direction and man-
igement. Directors and officers are con-
I itantly changing with little regard.to ex-
I perience and competency.' .Tjie. simplest
llojm--.lmntu»-r»UfesUi»U-«Bb<>« isperhap^
1 safe/it is operated over a small territory^
ita minimum of expense and seeks no
accumulations for investment or fraud.
Tbis kind of insurance in practice seems
it no discount as .compared with stock
insurance.* It lacks, however, the principle of perpetuity which - stock companies
| possess to a considerable degree. The latter Have the advantage in operating on a
I large scale and in seeking accumulations
tor investment. They are organized as a
rule by persons of business aptitude and
experience. They organize to secure investment for their own capital and not
infrequently to provide portions for
themselves or others. They have great
interests at stake financially and otherwise. This practically insures good direction and management and perpetuity.
Versus this: They name officers and fix
salaries; a multitude of subordinates and
agents are employed—the business is
operated over a vast territory;, there are
numerous rents and incidentals all tending to great expense and consequent excessive premiums. All said it waa perhaps wiser to risk old line stock insurance. It is hoped mutual insurance
will yet prove the better in practice
J as well as in seeming. X. Y.
Clark Co.
We have a Farmers' Mutual Insurance
I Co. in Steuben county that was organized
I In 1878, and has increased each year until
I we now have about two million dollars'
I worth of property insured. We have one
I Erector in each township. He is the au-
I tocrized agent in his township to take ap-
I Plications tor insurance. When the company has a loss they borrow the money
I tod pay it, and make assessments once a
pear to cover all losses and expenses. We
1 find this much better than to make assessments after each loss. I prefer mutual in-
I'-rance because it is cheaper and our
l**oney stays at home and we pay a small
Ijmonnt each year instead of paying all in
jWvance, as in stock companies. Each
l*~*mber Sets a notice of the losses for the
I ?~ar and he knows when* he pays his as-
I'M-mentthatit goes to pay his neigh-
lllrn8 l0S8' ■*'costa about *-° centson 6ftoh
I'-ooinsnred, a year. John Harpham.
!5t"uben Co.
- REVIEW. '
Ibiu P0S01-0 °~~e doubts for a moment
l~osi<_i'>at -m-tttal stock companies com-
I « of farmers of any one county are
absolutely safe. The only question is
that of cost* and efficiency. These will
depend on the local talent and the plan
adopted. Counties do not hesitate to
grapple with larger problems such as
building costly courthouses and bridges,
etc., for lack of business talent.
There is nothing very complicated in a
plan of local mutual Insurance. One
danger lies in friendly personal influence
taking property too high or assessing
loss too high. One must also expect
greater extremes as the amount of risks
is smaller. We may pay 40 cents one
year and 11 cents another and sometimes
no assessment at all. We like one "agent"
better than on, for each township, and our
home company often borrows money or
makes an assessment overrun a little to
avoid too frequent collections.
Our policy covers barns and contents
instead of naming each thing contained.
Also we may add, say 1,000 bushels of
wheat in granary at threshing time and
when we sell can have it removed so as
to carry the risk only while needed. It
is so often that stock companies send
agents who seem to quibble and cut out
several things by technicalities and then
after delay offer to pay with a heavy discount for cash. Our company will adjust
a claim, in a week and deposit your full
amount due in spot cash to be of immediate use for rebuilding.
I have before me the Rosendale company's '21st. statement,, Fo__jd-__JDu. |
Tags
Comments
Post a Comment for Page 1